Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Toyotas (and Fords) 600 times more dangerous than media reports

February 9, 2010
Car crash

Why do Americans have so many car crashes? It's the amount of time we spend in cars

An estimated 19 people have died in crashes related to unexpected acceleration in Toyota-made vehicles over the last decade. This has led to a national uproar, dominating the news cycle and flooding dealers with recalled autos to repair.

I did some back-of-the-envelope calculations to put the problem in perspective. In a year, Toyota drivers, if they are like other drivers, put about 11,400 miles on their vehicle.
Ten years of driving (114,000 miles, give or take), times
the number of vehicles involved in the recall (8 million),
equals
the total miles driven by recalled vehicles over 10 years (912 billion miles; that’s 9.12 x 10^11 for you exponentially-minded people)
.

So dividing the number of deaths (19) by the total miles driven gives an estimated risk of death from sudden acceleration:
2 deaths per 100 bn vehicle miles traveled

To put that in perspective, in 2008, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration calculates your risk of dying from an automobile accident at 1270 deaths per 100 bn vehicle miles traveled.

Hmmm. That means that you are over 600 times more likely to die in an automobile fatality in ANY make of car than you are to die from Toyota’s flawed acceleration system. Statistically speaking, stuck accelerators and faulty floor mats just don’t matter.

Getting in a car is inherently dangerous.

But it is worse than that. By building our cities the way we have since World War II, we in the United States are virtually forcing our citizens to make very dangerous choices, if they want to work, go to school, go to the doctor, or shop. Relatively few Americans live in neighborhoods where they can choose not to have a car, largely because we’ve built our cities on the cheap, failing to provide public transportation alternatives, outlawing mixed-use developments through perverse zoning policies, and subsidizing development on the margins of our cities with public money. In the case of land-use and transportation, we get exactly the system our policies promote.

Getting in a car is dangerous, and it’s hard to avoid getting in a car. It’s even dangerous for people who aren’t in the cars.

While we’ve abandoned the American landscape to the automobile, the death rate from traffic fatalities in the US, for passengers, drivers, and pedestrians, has leapfrogged past every other cause of death for children over the age of one, and it remains the leading cause of death even for young adults.

Citizens in the U.S. are twice as likely to die from automobiles as citizens in the United Kingdom, to take another developed world example; and we have the highest risk of any developed country, not because our roads are more dangerous, or our cars more deadly. Our death rate is sky-high because we expect people to drive everywhere, and therefore we spend much more time in cars than folks in other countries. We’ve built a landscape in which no one is seriously expected to walk or bike to any destination. This has an effect on our obesity rate, and on all the diseases driven by being overweight (diabetes, heart disease, stroke, stress, cancer). But the main health effect is on the number of Americans who die in the traffic epidemic.

But we take this deadly epidemic (and the corresponding injury rates) without blinking, having become convinced that it is somehow natural to have 35,000 Americans die each year on the road.

There are alternatives: it is possible to design healthy places that are not only safe but which cultivate community, flourishing economies, and happy families. For ideas, check out the Healthy Places section of the CDC website, or these other resources on healthy places for community developers at Flourish’s website.

Related resources:
How your church can do a walkability audit
“Walking to Justice (Walkability, Justice, and Healthy Cities)” by Rusty Pritchard, from current PRISM magazine (Jan/Feb 2010)
Flourish resource list on Walkability, Liveability, and Justice (for the CCDA conference)
Congress for New Urbanism
CDC Healthy Places

Chicken stock for the soul

December 8, 2009

Ok, never mind chicken SOUP, even metaphorical soup. I’m talking stock, that liquid essence now reduced to something from a can or a bouillon cube, but which is the stuff of cooks’ dreams. Here’s what the Rombauers say about stock in The Joy of Cooking (my second favorite food book, after Harold McGee’s On Food and Cooking: The Science and Lore of the Kitchen):

Antique dealers may respond hopefully to dusty bits in attics, but true cooks palpitate over even more curious oddments: mushroom and tomato skins, fowl carcasses, tender celery leaves, fish heads, knucklebones, and chicken feet. These are just a few of the treasures for the stockpot–that magic source from which comes the telling character of the cuisine. (more…)

Friday is Buy Nothing Day

November 25, 2009

Buy Nothing Day is coming up, in case you forgot: the annual 24-hour moratorium on consumer spending, celebrated by people in over 65 countries, when more and more folks are saving money and avoiding the Christmas shopping crowds. Oh, and it’s the Day after Thanksgiving.

American Buy Nothing Day is Nov 27 this year, but overseas it is Nov 28.

Here’s how Adbusters recommends to take the plunge in buying nothing:

You know what they say: a journey of a thousand miles starts with a single step. You feel that things are falling apart – the temperature rising, the oceans churning, the global economy heaving – why not do something? Take just one small step toward a more just and sustainable future. Make a pact with yourself: go on a consumer fast. Lock up your credit cards, put away your cash and opt out of the capitalist spectacle. You may find that it’s harder than you think, that the impulse to buy is more ingrained in you than you ever realized. But you will persist and you will transcend – perhaps reaching the kind of epiphany that can change the world.

Of course, just expelling the demons of consumerism without filling the shell with abundant living is dangerous (as Jesus said). So Kendra Juskus, of Flourish, has posted some great ideas for what to do on and after the day the world calls Black Friday (so named because marks the transition of retailers balance sheets from being “in the red” to being “in the black”). In “Curing the Black Friday Blues,” she writes:

A coalition of Black Friday resisters is emerging, and its efforts are galvanizing folks to savor the un-buyable joys of the holiday season by creating gifts, purchasing gifts that support good work and ministry throughout the world, buying fairly made products, or buying nothing at all.

And also on the Flourish website is a fun, FREE, creative, nature activity for your beautiful Friday walk, when everyone else is in the shopping mall fighting for bargains. Send us a photo of your land art and we’ll post it on the web for others to see.

So take Friday off, not just from work, but from the treadmill of consumption that threatens to undermine the economy, our families, and the very planet itself.

Give thanks to the Lord this Thanksgiving (the real Earth Day).

This post will appear this week as part of ESA’s ePistle newsletter.

News story on Southeastern Baptist Creation Care Conference

November 18, 2009

Lauren Crane of Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary wrote a synopsis of the conference I spoke at October 31 and November 1. The conference was called Creation Care: A Theology of Creation Stewardship.

…Saturday morning of the conference, Rusty Pritchard, a resource economist and the president and co-founder of Flourish, an environmental stewardship organization that equips churches to care for creation in ways that love God and help people, closed the conference by offering suggestions as to how Christians ought to respond to the creation care issues.

“I have become convinced more and more that the way we live is not just unsustainable, or bad for the planet, but it’s less than human,” Pritchard said. “God delights in his creatures. How can we delight in creation if we pay them no mind? Creation stewardship functions best when it arises organically from a love and respect for creation, but this passion is not self-generating. Somehow, in our fallen state, we don’t automatically love the things that God created good. This is a judgment on us, and not on God.

“We have to cultivate a love for the creatures God created,” Pritchard said. “Do we look at creation? Do we examine it? Do we live in it? Most of us don’t . We need to move – not from respect to reverence (for creation) – but to start with a different “r” which is regard.”

That last observation was inspired by Robert Kingsolver, Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences at Bellarmine University in Louisville, Kentucky. He got me thinking about our lack of regard for creation over a year ago with a remark he made at Maryville College, and it has come to frame my own diagnosis of why we fail at creation care. We’re not even looking at creation, most of the time. Many of us recognize only a tiny fraction of the birds and trees in our own gardens. How can we love and care for what we only rarely encounter?

Waterproof Bible arrived

October 20, 2009
NIV Waterproof Bible

NIV Waterproof Bible

Hot (well, at least still-warm) off the press, my NIV Waterproof Bible was opened today. Flourish friend Bobby Bardin at Bardin & Marsee Publishing sent it a couple of weeks ago, but I’ve been on the road nearly non-stop. I’m glad to have it now and start using it. They’ve got a range of waterproof bible products–check out their catalog.

Is it really waterproof? I saw Bobby’s exhibit at the Catalyst Conference in Atlanta last week, (more…)

Social justice and reduced calcification in planktonic foraminifera

April 1, 2009

So, you may be asking yourself, what does reduced calcification in modern Southern Ocean planktonic foraminifera have to with social justice? You can either read the study yourself (entitled "Reduced Calcification in Modern Southern Ocean Planktonic Foraminifera"), or read on in this post!

Excessive carbon dioxide in the atmosphere doesn't stay put, thankfully. Various processes in the earth's systems remove carbon from the atmosphere, and these mechanisms have kept atmospheric carbon dioxide levels pretty stable for a long period of time. Everyone knows by now that plants take up carbon dioxide. But oceans absorb a lot more, and there is new evidence that one of the biological pumps removing CO2 from the atmosphere is giving out.

(more…)

Videophilia replacing love of nature

April 1, 2009

In the late 1900s researchers like E.O. Wilson and Stephen Kellert began using the term "biophilia" to describe the basic love of other living things that humans seem to exhibit–an affection that encompassed nature, other species, diversity. So strong an affinity, so powerful an affect, was biophilia that the researchers decided it must be instinctive, built into the human brain by natural selection because it was an aid to survival.

Or else it's part of God's (intelligent, by definition) design–to make gardeners who love the garden. I'm betting on the latter hypothesis.

But there's a competing impulse, a dark attraction that fights for the affection of humans. Is it money? Sex? Power?

No, it's actually video screens. There is a strong negative relationship between the amount of time people spend on the Internet, playing video games, and watching television and movies, and the amount of time people spend outside in nature. Humans seem to have a (built-in? instinctive?) love of flat screen TVs and handheld video devices.

Biophilia is being replaced by videophilia.

(more…)

Videophilia replacing love of nature

March 16, 2009

In the late 1900s researchers like E.O. Wilson and Stephen Kellert began using the term "biophilia" to describe the basic love of other living things that humans seem to exhibit–an affection that encompassed nature, other species, diversity. So strong an affinity, so powerful an affect, was biophilia that the researchers decided it must be instinctive, built into the human brain by natural selection because it was an aid to survival.

Or else it's part of God's (intelligent, by definition) design–to make gardeners who love the garden. I'm betting on the latter hypothesis.

But there's a competing impulse, a dark attraction that fights for the affection of humans. Is it money? Sex? Power?

No, it's actually video screens. There is a strong negative relationship between the amount of time people spend on the Internet, playing video games, and watching television and movies, and the amount of time people spend outside in nature. Humans seem to have a (built-in? instinctive?) love of flat screen TVs and handheld video devices.

Biophilia is being replaced by videophilia.

(more…)

Evangelicals get gold star for creation care

March 9, 2009

Martin Marty is not an evangelical commentator, but he does comment on evangelicals frequently, and his writings are often useful to me, to see how our work is viewed from other Christian perspectives. The Martin Marty Center at University of Chicago publishes Sightings, a stream of reflections on faith in public life. I’m not a current subscriber, but Al Tizon sent me one of Marty’s columns last week, on “Evangelicals and the Environment“, well worth noting for its paternalistic tone as well as its content.

Marty reviews a recent book from the Wheaton College community called Christians, the Care of Creation, and Global Climate Change, a nice volume for its slimness (would that other books were as economical with their length). It’s recommended reading…

But what’s particularly interesting to me is the care Marty takes to distance himself from Evangelicals, lest his non-evangelical audience mistake his sympathetic observations for whole-hearted approval.

We’ll see more of these sorts of pieces in the future, as more evangelicals join the environmental conversation.

It’s a combination of head-patting approval, finger-wagging for being tardy, tut-tutting about our evangelical hang-ups, and instrumental use of our creation care efforts to goad mainliners into action. Nothing lights a fire under Episcopalians and Unitarians on social issues like saying “Look, even the evangelicals are on board with this issue!”

It would be nice if we could get something better than a “most improved” award.

We should also begin to see a standardized proviso emerge in commentaries about evangelical environmental action, as with commentaries on evangelical social action–a note that these new development are encouraging, and that these are native fruit from seeds planted in the evangelical garden long ago by people like Francis Schaeffer, Cal DeWitt, Ron Sider and others.

Faithful Urbanism

March 2, 2009

The weekend brought a rare snowfall to Atlanta (four inches at my house) and with it the typical breathless wall-to-wall weather news coverage that every winter event precipitates in the South. With the possibility of ice on the road, I knew, as a responsible Southerner with a reasonable assessment of my winter driving skills, that I should go nowhere near an automobile. So we played in the mushy wet snow all day Sunday.

Snow and ice are disturbances to life as normal, and they reveal much about the underlying structure of life. One of the main things they reveal is how far-flung our relationships are in terms of geography–being forced out of our cars decouples many of us from work, school, church, shopping, friends and family. Such disturbances also cause us to rediscover more proximate relationships, with actual and not metaphorical neighbors, and to find fun in our own neighborhoods, something we'll need to do more in the future as energy costs rise.

Not driving to church (and not having to preach) also meant I had time to pick up some material from my "to read" stack. Yesterday it was the white paper by Michael Van Pelt and Richard Greydanus from the Work Research Foundation in Hamilton, Ontario, entitled "Living on the Streets: The Role of the Church in Urban Renewal." Scott Calgaro of the Coalition for Christian Outreach put it in my hands months ago, and it took a snowstorm slow me down enough to read it. It's a great resource for anyone concerned with social justice, the built environment, and the role of faith communities in urban life. The PDF is available for free download.

(more…)